Investigation of the Influence of Key Parameters on the Mixing Efficiency of Two Fluids in Multi-Stage Micro-Mixers Based on Tesla Valve Structure

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mahziyar Ghaedi 1
Hamid-Reza Bahrami 2
1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Mechanic, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Qom University of Technology, Qom, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Qom University of Technology, Qom, Iran
Abstract
Micro-mixers play a significant role in the gas industry in achieving uniform gas mixing at micro-scales and reducing energy consumption. One approach to constructing micro-mixers involves using multiple stages of Tesla valves, which guide and blend flow through a special design. This study uses the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method and finite volume-based solver to investigate the impact of parameters such as configuration direction (direct and oblique), number of stages, Reynolds number, inlet velocity difference, and flow direction on the performance of Tesla micro-mixers. Results show that arrangement efficiency depends on the inlet Reynolds number; at low Reynolds numbers, direct configurations perform better, with approximately 20% higher mixing efficiency at Reynolds number one compared to oblique configurations. At higher Reynolds numbers, oblique configurations prove more effective, with 20% better performance. Additionally, in all cases, oblique configurations create more pressure drop, impacting the overall system efficiency

Keywords

Subjects

  1. R.R. Hemrajani, Fluid Mixing Technology in the Petroleum Industry, in: E.L. Paul, V.A. Atiemo‐Obeng, S.M. Kresta (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Mixing, 1st ed., Wiley, 2003: pp. 1171–1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471451452.ch19.
  2. A.A. Araoye, A. Abdelhafez, M.A. Nemitallah, M.A. Habib, R. Ben-Mansour, M. Hussain, Shape and stability characteristics of hydrogen-enriched natural-gas oxy-flames in a micromixer burner, Combustion Science and Technology 195 (2023) 1887–1909. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2021.2006190.
  3. R. Gan, W. Wang, B. Li, G. Yang, X. Li, Design of High-Temperature Gas Mixing Device Based on Tesla-Type Channel, in: 2023 9th International Conference on Fluid Power and Mechatronics (FPM), IEEE, Lanzhou, China, 2023: pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FPM57590.2023.10565627.
  4. A. Zacepins, D. Kotovs, V. Komasilovs, A. Kviesis, Economic Modelling of Mixing Hydrogen with Natural Gas, Processes 12 (2024) 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12020262.
  5. E. Rój, M. Dmoch, CFD study of gas mixing efficiency and comparisons with experimental data, in: Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, Elsevier, 2007: pp. 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-7946(07)80108-8.
  6. A.A. Araoye, A. Abdelhafez, R. Ben-Mansour, M.A. Nemitallah, M.A. Habib, On the quality of micromixing in an oxy-fuel micromixer burner for gas turbine applications: A numerical study, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 162 (2021) 108336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2021.108336.
  7. X. Chen, H. Wang, C. Wang, X. Wang, N. Wang, X. Liu, Numerical investigation into fuel–air mixing characteristics and cold flow field of single hydrogen-rich Micromix nozzle, Fuel 332 (2023) 126181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126181.
  8. X. Chen, H. Wang, X. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Zhu, Fuel/air mixing characteristics of a Micromix burner for hydrogen-rich gas turbine, Energy 282 (2023) 128786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128786.
  9. A.M. Elbaz, M.S. Mansour, B.M. Akoush, M. Juddoo, A.M. Khedr, H.M. Al-Bulqini, M.F. Zayed, M.M.A. Ahmed, W.L. Roberts, A.R. Masri, Detailed investigation of the mixing field and stability of natural gas and propane in highly turbulent planar flames, Fuel 309 (2022) 122222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122222.
  10. A. Shahsavar, M. Hasani, A. Alizadeh, Two-phase simulation of hydrothermal performance and entropy generation aspects of a biologically prepared nanofluid-cooled heat sink with helical Tesla valve-based microchannels, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 58 (2024) 104429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.104429.
  11. H. Shi, Y. Cao, Y. Zeng, Y. Zhou, W. Wen, C. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Z. Chen, Wearable tesla valve-based sweat collection device for sweat colorimetric analysis, Talanta 240 (2022) 123208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123208.
  12. A. Purwidyantri, B.A. Prabowo, Tesla Valve Microfluidics: The Rise of Forgotten Technology, Chemosensors 11 (2023) 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11040256.
  13. K. Mohammadzadeh, M. Gharib, M. and Abbasi, Numerical Investigation of Oscillatory Fluid Flow Through a Tesla Microvalve, Modares Mechanical Engineering 18 (2018). http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-908-fa.html.
  14. K. Mohammadzadeh, E.M. Kolahdouz, E. and Shirani, Numerical study on the effect of the number of stages on the performance of Tesla microvalve and comparison with nozzle/diffuser microvalve, Modares Mechanical Engineering 12 (2013). http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-6973-fa.html.
  15. S. Razavi Bazaz, A. Sayyah, A.H. Hazeri, R. Salomon, A. Abouei Mehrizi, M. Ebrahimi Warkiani, Micromixer research trend of active and passive designs, Chemical Engineering Science 293 (2024) 120028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2024.120028.
  16. M. Xiong, J. Yang, X. Ding, H. Li, H. Zhang, Topology optimization design of micromixer based on principle of Tesla valve: An experimental and numerical study, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 193 (2023) 109560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2023.109560.
  17. B. Lee, M. Kim, S. Oh, D. Bi Lee, S.-G. Lee, H. Min Kim, K.H. Kim, J. Song, C.-S. Lee, Characterization of passive microfluidic mixer with a three-dimensional zig-zag channel for cryo-EM sampling, Chemical Engineering Science 281 (2023) 119161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.119161.
  18. S. Gimondi, H. Ferreira, R.L. Reis, N.M. Neves, Microfluidic Devices: A Tool for Nanoparticle Synthesis and Performance Evaluation, ACS Nano 17 (2023) 14205–14228. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c01117.
  19. M.A. Khan, M. Suhaib, M.A. Ansari, Investigations on fluid flow and mixing in fractal tree like biomimetic microchannel based on Murray’s law, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 194 (2023) 109564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2023.109564.
  20. Y. Shao, H. Wang, Q. Zhang, Z. Xie, X. Zhu, Y. Ding, R. Chen, Q. Liao, Cross-channel microfluidic device for dynamic control of concentration and velocity by the electroosmotic drive, Chemical Engineering Science 281 (2023) 119139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.119139.
  21. C.-C. Hong, J.-W. Choi, C.H. Ahn, A novel in-plane passive microfluidic mixer with modified Tesla structures, Lab Chip 4 (2004) 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1039/B305892A.
  22. X. Weng, S. Yan, Y. Zhang, J. Liu, J. Shen, Design, simulation and experimental study of a micromixer based on Tesla valve structure, Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress 40 (2021) 4173–4178. https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-1894.
  23. X. Wang, L. Yang, F. Sun, CFD analysis and RSM optimization of obstacle layout in Tesla micromixer, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 19 (2021) 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2021-0087.
  24. P. Wang, P. Hu, L. Liu, Z. Xu, W. Wang, B. Scheid, On the diodicity enhancement of multistage Tesla valves, Physics of Fluids 35 (2023) 052010. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0145172.
  25. W.L. Buglie, K.F. Tamrin, N.A. Sheikh, M.F.M. Yasin, S. Mohamaddan, Enhanced fluid mixing using a reversed multistage Tesla micromixer, Chemical Engineering & Technology 45 (2022) 1255–1263.
  26. G. Du, T.R. Alsenani, J. Kumar, S. Alkhalaf, T. Alkhalifah, F. Alturise, H. Almujibah, S. Znaidia, A. Deifalla, Improving thermal and hydraulic performances through artificial neural networks: An optimization approach for Tesla valve geometrical parameters, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 52 (2023) 103670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103670.
  27. F. Huang, L. Ren, S. Xie, M. Leng, P. Liao, Numerical study of flow characteristics and heat transfer mechanism in Tesla valve tube, Results in Engineering 21 (2024) 101795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101795.
  28. M. Juraeva, D.-J. Kang, Mixing Performance of a Passive Micromixer Based on Split-to-Circulate (STC) Flow Characteristics, Micromachines 15 (2024) 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15060773.
  29. M. Juraeva, D.-J. Kang, Design and Mixing Analysis of a Passive Micromixer with Circulation Promoters, Micromachines 15 (2024) 831. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15070831.
  30. M. Siavashi, H.R. Talesh Bahrami, H. Saffari, Numerical investigation of flow characteristics, heat transfer and entropy generation of nanofluid flow inside an annular pipe partially or completely filled with porous media using two-phase mixture model, Energy 93 (2015) 2451–2466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.100.
  31. R.W. Fox, A.T. McDonald, P.J. Pritchard, J.C. Leylegian, Fox and McDonald’s introduction to fluid mechanics, 8. ed, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2011.
  32. H. Chanson, Physical modelling of hydraulics, in: Hydraulics of Open Channel Flow, Elsevier, 2004: pp. 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075065978-9/50021-0.
  33. Y. Bai, Q. Bai, Hydraulics, in: Subsea Engineering Handbook, Elsevier, 2010: pp. 349–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-689-7.10013-5.
  34. M. Juraeva, D.-J. Kang, Mixing Performance of a Passive Micromixer Based on Multiple Baffles and Submergence Scheme, Micromachines 14 (2023) 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14051078.
  35. S. Hossain, M.A. Ansari, K.-Y. Kim, Evaluation of the mixing performance of three passive micromixers, Chemical Engineering Journal 150 (2009) 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.033.

  • Receive Date 23 November 2024
  • Revise Date 13 December 2024
  • Accept Date 24 December 2024