مروری‌ بر روش‌های ذخیره گاز هیدروژن به‌عنوان یک حامل انرژی

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان
نگار شاهدعلی 1
فائزه برزگری 1
مهدی رضوی فر 2
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی، دانشکده مهندسی شیمی و نفت، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
2 استادیار، دانشکده مهندسی شیمی و نفت، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
چکیده
هیدروژن به‌عنوان یکی از اجزای کلیدی در کربن‌زدایی سیستم انرژی جهانی، نقش حیاتی در جایگزینی سوخت‌های فسیلی در بخش‌های مختلف از جمله صنعت، تولید برق، حمل‌ونقل و گرمایش ایفا می‌کند. برای تحقق این هدف، علاوه بر کاهش هزینه‌های تولید هیدروژن، توسعه زیرساخت‌های کارآمد برای ذخیره‌سازی، حمل‌ونقل و توزیع آن ضروری است. ذخیره‌سازی هیدروژن به دو روش اصلی انجام می‌شود؛ ذخیره‌سازی فیزیکی که شامل نگه‌داری هیدروژن در حالت گازی فشرده، مایع یا فوق‌بحرانی است و نیز ذخیره‌سازی مبتنی بر مواد مانند استفاده از حامل‌های آلی هیدروژن مایع، هیدریدهای فلزی یا سوخت‌های توان‌زا می‌باشد. همچنین، ذخیره‌سازی زیرزمینی هیدروژن به‌عنوان یک راه‌حل امیدوارکننده مطرح است، هرچند که تجربه عملی در این زمینه هنوز محدود است. با وجود پتانسیل بالای هیدروژن در سیستم‌های انرژی تجدیدپذیر، چالش‌های علمی و عملیاتی متعددی از جمله ایمنی ذخیره‌سازی، بهینه‌سازی زیرساخت و مدیریت هزینه‌ها وجود دارد. در این مطالعه به بررسی جامع ذخیره‌سازی زیرزمین هیدروژن پرداخته و رویکردهای پیشروی این فناوری ارائه شده است. نتایج ارائه شده در این مقاله، بسترسازی مناسبی به‌منظور استفاده از این روش در ایران باهدف تولید انرژی پایدار است
کلیدواژه‌ها
هیدروژن
حامل انرژی
ذخیره‌سازی زیرزمینی
مخازن نفت و گاز
تولید پایدار انرژی
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

A Review of Hydrogen Gas Storage Methods as an Energy Carrier

نویسندگان English

Negar Shahedali 1
Faezeh Barzegari 1
Mehdi Razavifar 2
1 B.Sc. Student, Faculty of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده English

Hydrogen, as a key component in decarbonizing the global energy system, plays a vital role in replacing fossil fuels in various sectors, including industry, power generation, transportation, and heating. To achieve this goal, in addition to reducing hydrogen production costs, the development of efficient infrastructure for its storage, transportation, and distribution is essential. Hydrogen storage is primarily accomplished through two main methods: physical storage, which involves storing hydrogen in compressed gas, liquid, or supercritical states, and material-based storage, such as using liquid organic hydrogen carriers, metal hydrides, or synthetic fuels. Additionally, underground hydrogen storage is emerging as a promising solution, although practical experience in this area is still limited. Despite hydrogen’s high potential in renewable energy systems, there are numerous scientific and operational challenges, including storage safety, infrastructure optimization, and cost management. This study comprehensively investigates underground hydrogen storage and presents the approaches to this technology. The results presented in this article lay a good foundation for using this method in Iran with the aim of producing sustainable energy.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Hydrogen
Energy Carrier
Underground Storage
Oil and Gas Reservoirs
Sustainable Energy Production
  1. Hanley, E.S., J. Deane, and B.Ó. Gallachóir, The role of hydrogen in low carbon energy futures–A review of existing perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018. 82: p. 3027–3045.
  2. McPherson, M., N. Johnson, and M. Strubegger, The role of electricity storage and hydrogen technologies in enabling global low-carbon energy transitions. Applied Energy, 2018. 216: p. 649–661.
  3. UNIDO, Towards Hydrogen Societies: Expert Group Meeting. 2018.
  4. EIA, U., California’s curtailment of solar electricity generation continues to increase. 2021.
  5. Lemmon, E.W., Thermophysical properties of fluid systems. NIST chemistry WebBook, 2010.
  6. Yin, L. and Y. Ju, Review on the design and optimization of hydrogen liquefaction processes. Frontiers in Energy, 2020. 14: p. 530–544.
  7. Chabab, S., et al., Measurements and predictive models of high-pressure H2 solubility in brine (H2O+ NaCl) for underground hydrogen storage application. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020. 45(56): p. 32206–32220.
  8. Miao Yang , R.H., Stefano Berrettoni , Bernd Sprecher , Baodong Wang, A review of hydrogen storage and transport technologies Clean Energy, February 2023. 7(1): p. 190–216.
  9. Ozarslan, A., Large-scale hydrogen energy storage in salt caverns. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2012. 37(19): p. 14265–14277.
  10. Amid, A., D. Mignard, and M. Wilkinson, Seasonal storage of hydrogen in a depleted natural gas reservoir. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2016. 41(12): p. 5549–5558.
  11. Sáinz-García, A., et al., Assessment of feasible strategies for seasonal underground hydrogen storage in a saline aquifer. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2017. 42(26): p. 16657–16666.
  12. Johannes Miocic, N.H., Katriona Edlmann, Jonathan Scafidi,v, Underground hydrogen storage: a review. 2023. 528: p. 73 – 86.
  13. Nikolaidis, P. and A. Poullikkas, A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2017. 67: p. 597–611.
  14. Ali, M., Isah, A., Yekeen, N., Hassanpouryouzband, A., Sarmadivaleh, M., Okoroafor, R., ... & Hoteit, H. (2025). Recent progress in underground hydrogen storage. Energy & Environmental Science.‏
  15. Łukajtis, R., et al., Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018. 91: p. 665–694.
  16. Cao, L., et al., Biorenewable hydrogen production through biomass gasification: A review and future prospects. Environmental research, 2020. 186: p. 109547.
  17. Kumar, S.S. and V. Himabindu, Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis–A review. Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 2019. 2(3): p. 442–454.
  18. Safari, F. and I. Dincer, A review and comparative evaluation of thermochemical water splitting cycles for hydrogen production. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020. 205: p. 112182.
  19. Reitenbach, V., Ganzer, L., Albrecht, D., & Hagemann, B. (2015). Influence of added hydrogen on underground gas storage: a review of key issues. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(11), 6927-6937.‏
  20. Global, I., Hydrogen review 2021. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2021.
  21. Union, I., Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels. http://ww. w. xploit-eu. com/pdfs/Europe, 2014. 202020: p. 20.
  22. Commission, E.T., Making the hydrogen economy possible: Accelerating clean hydrogen in an electrified economy. 2021.
  23. Dutta, S., A review on production, storage of hydrogen and its utilization as an energy resource. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2014. 20(4): p. 1148–1156.
  24. US Department of Energy. Hydrogen Storage (Chapter 3.3 from Multi-Year Research, D., and Demonstration Plan). DOE, 2015. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2015/05/f22/fcto_myrdd_storage.pdf, 2015.
  25. Barthélémy, H., M. Weber, and F. Barbier, Hydrogen storage: Recent improvements and industrial perspectives. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2017. 42(11): p. 7254–7262.
  26. Legault M. Pressure vessel tank types. 2012. https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/pressure-vessel-tank-types (14 September 2021, d.l.a.
  27. Rivard, E., M. Trudeau, and K. Zaghib, Hydrogen storage for mobility: a review. Materials, 2019. 12(12): p. 1973.
  28. Parks, G., et al., Hydrogen station compression, storage, and dispensing technical status and costs. 2014, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States).
  29. Elgowainy, A., et al., Tube-trailer consolidation strategy for reducing hydrogen refueling station costs. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2014. 39(35): p. 20197–20206. https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/progress11/iv_e_3_law_2011.pdf (14 September 2021, date last accessed)., L.K.F.A.P.R.I.E.C.A.o.H.S.M.a.O.-B.S.D.H.a.F.C.P.
  30. FIBA Technologies Inc. High Pressure Hydrogen Type II Vessel. 2014. https://www.fibatech.com/2014/11/24/type-2-hydrogen-vessel/ (1 August 2022, d.l.a.
  31. Tarkowski, R., Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019. 105: p. 86–94.
  32. Zivar D, K.S., Foroozesh J. Underground hydrogen storage: A comprehensive review. International journal of hydrogen energy. 2021 Jul 1;46(45):23436-62.
  33. Valenti G. Hydrogen liquefaction and liquid hydrogen storage. In: Gupta RB, B.A., Veziroğlu TN (eds). Compendium of Hydrogen Energy. Volume 2: Hydrogen Storage, Transportation and
  34. Infrastructure. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2016, 27–51.
  35. Derking, H., et al., Liquid hydrogen storage: status and future perspectives. Cryogenic Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019.
  36. Petitpas, G., Boil-off losses along LH2 pathway. 2018, Lawrence Livermore National Lab.(LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States).
  37. Swanger, A., et al. Large scale production of densified hydrogen to the triple point and below. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2017. IOP Publishing.
  38. Brunner, T. and O. Kircher, Cryo‐compressed hydrogen storage. Hydrogen science and engineering: materials, processes, systems and technology, 2016: p. 711–732.
  39. Yanxing, Z., et al., Thermodynamics analysis of hydrogen storage based on compressed gaseous hydrogen, liquid hydrogen and cryo-compressed hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019. 44(31): p. 16833–16840.
  40. Ahluwalia, R., et al., Supercritical cryo-compressed hydrogen storage for fuel cell electric buses. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018. 43(22): p. 10215–10231.
  41. Xu, Z., et al., Supply system of cryo-compressed hydrogen for fuel cell stacks on heavy duty trucks. international journal of hydrogen energy, 2020. 45(23): p. 12921–12931.
  42. Stolten, D., R.C. Samsun, and N. Garland, Fuel cells: data, facts, and figures. 2016: John Wiley & Sons. 
  43. Perera, M. S. A. (2023). A review of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: Insights into various rock-fluid interaction mechanisms and their impact on the process integrity. Fuel, 334, 126677.‏
  44. Rao, P.C. and M. Yoon, Potential liquid-organic hydrogen carrier (LOHC) systems: A review on recent progress. Energies, 2020. 13(22): p. 6040.
  45. Yan, J., et al., Dehydrogenation of methylcyclohexane over PtSn supported on MgAl mixed metal oxides derived from layered double hydroxides. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018. 43(19): p. 9343–9352.
  46. Hirscher, M. and M. Becher, Hydrogen storage in carbon nanotubes. Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology, 2003. 3(1-2): p. 3–17.
  47. Mohan, M., et al., Hydrogen storage in carbon materials—A review. Energy Storage, 2019. 1(2): p. e35.
  48. Sakintuna, B., F. Lamari-Darkrim, and M. Hirscher, Metal hydride materials for solid hydrogen storage: a review. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2007. 32(9): p. 1121–1140.
  49. Zaluska, A., L. Zaluski, and J. Ström–Olsen, Nanocrystalline magnesium for hydrogen storage. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 1999. 288(1-2): p. 217–225.
  50. Li, J., et al., Modeling the construction of energy storage salt caverns in bedded salt. Applied Energy, 2019. 255: p. 113866.
  51. Evans, D., et al., Salt cavern exergy storage capacity potential of UK massively bedded halites, using compressed air energy storage (CAES). Applied Sciences, 2021. 11(11): p. 4728.
  52. Lux, K.-H., Design of salt caverns for the storage of natural gas, crude oil and compressed air: Geomechanical aspects of construction, operation and abandonment. 2009.
  53. Le Duigou, A., et al., Relevance and costs of large scale underground hydrogen storage in France. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017. 42(36): p. 22987–23003.
  54. Buzek, F., et al., Carbon isotope study of methane production in a town gas storage reservoir. Fuel, 1994. 73(5): p. 747–752.
  55. Kruck, O., et al., Assessment of the potential, the actors and relevant business cases for large scale and seasonal storage of renewable electricity by hydrogen underground storage in Europe. KBB Undergr. Technol. GmbH, 2013: p. 1–32.
  56. Panfilov, M., Underground and pipeline hydrogen storage, in Compendium of hydrogen energy. 2016, Elsevier. p. 91–115.
  57. Biegger, P., F. Kittinger, and M. Lehner. Underground Sun Conversion. in Book of Abstracts. 2018.
  58. Ramesh Kumar, K., et al., Geomechanical simulation of energy storage in salt formations. Scientific Reports, 2021. 11(1): p. 19640.
  59. Spiers, C., et al., Experimental determination of constitutive parameters governing creep of rocksalt by pressure solution. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1990. 54(1): p. 215–227.
  60. Asgari, A., et al., Stability analysis of salt cavern gas storage using 2D thermo-hydro-mechanical finite-element software. Journal of Mining and Environment, 2020. 11(1): p. 77–97.
  61. Urai, J., J. Schmatz, and J. Klaver, Over-pressured salt solution mining caverns and leakage mechanisms Phase 1: Micro-scale processes (Project KEM-17), MaP–Microstructure and Pores GmbH. Aachen.[Google Scholar], 2019.
  62. Hunsche, U. and A. Hampel, Rock salt—the mechanical properties of the host rock material for a radioactive waste repository. Engineering geology, 1999. 52(3-4): p. 271–291.
  63. Leister, N., et al., Salt Cavern Appraisal for Hydrogen and Gas Storage. Stage 2. 2018, ETI, Atkins.
  64. Khaledi, K., et al., Stability and serviceability of underground energy storage caverns in rock salt subjected to mechanical cyclic loading. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences, 2016. 86: p. 115–131.
  65. Heinemann, N., et al., Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media–the scientific challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 2021. 14(2): p. 853–864.
  66. Vavra, C.L., J.G. Kaldi, and R.M. Sneider, Geological applications of capillary pressure: a review. AAPG bulletin, 1992. 76(6): p. 840–850.
  67. Miocic, J.M., G. Johnson, and C.E. Bond, Uncertainty in fault seal parameters: implications for CO2 column height retention and storage capacity in geological CO2 storage projects. Solid earth, 2019. 10(3): p. 951–967.
  68. Hashemi, L., et al., A comparative study for H2–CH4 mixture wettability in sandstone porous rocks relevant to underground hydrogen storage. Advances in Water Resources, 2022. 163: p. 104165.
  69. Ali, M., et al., Assessment of wettability and rock-fluid interfacial tension of caprock: Implications for hydrogen and carbon dioxide geo-storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022. 47(30): p. 14104–14120.
  70. Tenthorey, E., et al., Modelling the geomechanics of gas storage: A case study from the Iona gas field, Australia. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013. 13: p. 138–148.
  71. Birkholzer, J.T., Q. Zhou, and C.-F. Tsang, Large-scale impact of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers: A sensitivity study on pressure response in stratified systems. International journal of greenhouse gas control, 2009. 3(2): p. 181–194.
  72. Tarkowski, R. (2019). Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, 86-94.‏
  73. Pijnenburg, R., et al., Inelastic deformation of the Slochteren sandstone: Stress‐strain relations and implications for induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2019. 124(5): p. 5254–5282.
  74. Wentinck, H.M. and A. Busch, Modelling of CO2 diffusion and related poro-elastic effects in a smectite-rich cap rock above a reservoir used for CO2 storage. 2017.
  75. Zahra Amiri, Negar ShahedAli,Faezeh Barzegari, Application of artificial intelligence in exploitation of hydrocarbon reservoirs,1403, https://civilica.com/doc/2047335/
  76. Zivar, D., S. Kumar, and J. Foroozesh, Underground hydrogen storage: A comprehensive review. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2021. 46(45): p. 23436–23462.
  77. Misra, B., et al. The use of inert base gas in underground natural gas storage. in SPE Unconventional Resources Conference/Gas Technology Symposium. 1988. SPE.
  78. Pfeiffer, W.T. and S. Bauer, Subsurface porous media hydrogen storage–scenario development and simulation. Energy Procedia, 2015. 76: p. 565–572.
  79. Hassanpouryouzband, A., et al., Thermodynamic and transport properties of hydrogen containing streams. Scientific data, 2020. 7(1): p. 222.
  80. Mouli-Castillo, J., N. Heinemann, and K. Edlmann, Mapping geological hydrogen storage capacity and regional heating demands: An applied UK case study. Applied Energy, 2021. 283: p. 116348.
  81. Scafidi, J., et al., A quantitative assessment of the hydrogen storage capacity of the UK continental shelf. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021. 46(12): p. 8629–8639.

  • تاریخ دریافت 22 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 24 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 27 آبان 1404