Evaluation of Greenhouse Gases Emission Inventory in Iranian Gas Transmission Facilities and Pipeline

Document Type : Review Paper

Authors
1 Faculty of Research and Development of Energy and Environment, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), Tehran, Iran
2 Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research, Tehran Branch, University of Tehran , Tehran, Iran
3 National Iranian Gas Company, Tehran, Iran
4 Iranian Gas Transmission Company, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Identifying the right sources of pollution, followed up with accurate emission measurement, is the first but the most important step in reducing and controlling greenhouse gases. Methane and carbon dioxide emission of Iranian gas transmission facilities is discussed in this article. All compression stations and transmission pipeline across the country are within the scope of this research. Different emission types (fugitive, vent and combustion) in various operating modes (normal, maintenance, startup and process upsets) were considered and annual emission rates for all identified sources were measured or estimated, based on emission/activity factors methods. Stations age and capacity, type of turbines and compressors and the ratio of capacity to number of runs were considered in statistical analysis. The results revealed 25 emission categories, among which fugitive emission from station valves was the greatest with 37.8% share of total emission. Fugitive emission from blow-downs of launcher-receivers (20.7%), fugitive from above-ground pipelines (12.2%), combustion emission in stations (12.5%) and vent from compressor seals (10.8%) were the other emission sources, respectively.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. United Nations, “Prototype Global Sustainable Development Report (Online unedited edition)”, New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development, 2014.
  2. James, Paul, Liam Magee, Andy Scerri, Manfred B. Steger, Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability, London: Routledge, 2015. 
  3. James, Paul, Andy Scerri, Circles of Sustainability Urban Profile Process, “Accounting for Sustainability: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Developing ‘Indicators’ of Sustainability”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13 (1): 41–53, 2010.
  4. Ruddiman, W.F., “The Anthropogenic Greenhouse Era Began Thousands of Years Ago”, Climate Change 61 (3): 261–293, 2003.
  5. http://www.epa.gov.
  6. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), “Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Reference Manual (Volume 3)”, United Nations Environment Programme, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the International Energy Agency, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1996.
  7. Gas Research Institute Canada (GRI Canada), “Handbook for Estimating Methane Emissions from Canadian Natural Gas Systems”, Prepared by Clearstone Engineering Ltd., Enerco Engineering Ltd., and Radian International for Gas Technology Canada, Guelph, ON, 1998.
  8. http://www.api.org.
  9. API 2004 - American Petroleum Institute (API), “Compendium of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimation Methodologies for the Oil and Gas Industry”; API, Washington, DC, 2004.
  10. Johansson, D., J., Rootzen, T., Bernstsson, F., Johnsson, “Assessment of Strategies for CO2 Abetment in the European Petroleum Refining Industry”, Energy 2012; 42: 375e86.
  11. Al-Salem, S.M., “Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emission Sources in Kuwait from the Downstream Industry: Critical Analysis with a Current and Futuristic View”, Energy 81 (2015) 575-587.
  12. www.nigc-nigtc.ir/

  • Receive Date 06 February 2018
  • Revise Date 28 April 2018
  • Accept Date 19 June 2018